Search the Community

Hi everyone, i made a comparison between the databases from GWB and EQ3/6. There are content differences between these two databases. The database content of EQ3/6 is similar to that of GWB, and the titles in the same line of the table below have similar content from No. 1 to No. 8. And No. 10&11 of EQ3/6 are break up and filled into other contents in GWB. However, the content of 'Solid solutions' in EQ3/6 and 'Oxide' in GWB seem to be the distinctive content in each database. I want to ask whether the database of GWB contains 'solid solution', if not, what effect will have on the simulation result? No. EQ3/6 GWB 1 Title including Options Header (References) 2 Miscellaneous parameters Tables 3 Elements Elements 4 Basis species Basis species (B-dot parameters) 5 Auxiliary basis species Redox couples (B-dot parameters) 6 Aqueous species Aqueous species (B-dot parameters) 7 Solids Minerals 8 Gases Gases 9 Solid solutions Oxides 10 B-dot parameters 11 References

I want to be able to carry forward values that are calculated from the output of React forward to the next iteration of React. For example, I would like to calculate the depth of material dissolved in one iteration of React forward to the next iteration. This is essentially calculating the diffusion of an element from the solid where the solid surface is retreating. Is there a way to carry values forward in a script and use them in the next iteration of React? Or, do I need to run React as a subrouting within an external C++ or fortran program? Denis