bine
-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by bine
-
-
Dear support team,
recently I am having trouble in calculating the solubility of Th(OH)4(am) depending on the carbonate concentration. The parameter file works well if I only include either carbonate without thorium or thorium without carbonate. If I include both I get the message "React stop: calc_hmw: max charge too large". With the help of a colleague I figured out that this is probably caused by the species Th(CO3)5(6-).
I am using react version 8.0.12 and colleague using version 9 had the same problem.
Do you have any idea how we can solve this issue?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best regards,
Christiane
-
Hello Tom,
I have a question regarding the treatment of the Pitzer parameters alpha1 and alpha2 in GWB.
In Craig`s book "Geochemical and Biogeochemical Reaction Modeling" (2nd edn) I find the following
equation in Table 8.1 on page 125 (under step 4):
BMX = beta0 + beta1 * g * (alpha1 * sqrt(I)) + beta2 * g * (12 * sqrt(I))
Is it correct, that the "12" represents the value of alpha2 and is it fixed to that value for
every possible cation-anion pair? This would imply that the alpha2 values given in the parameter
file are not really used?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Christiane
-
Hello,
so far, I´m not too experienced with GWB but I do think it is a very capable program
(I use version 8). Recently, I did some calculations about minerals precipitating
in chlorine solutions. In these calculations, the water mass decreases during the
simulations while the minerals incoporate water in their structures (I guess it`s
due to that).
Is there any possibility to keep the water mass constant anyways during simulation?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Christiane
I attach a script and the thermo_hmw database (though I made no changes on it).
Problems with Th(CO3)5(6-) species (React)
in The Geochemist's Workbench
Posted
Dear Brian Farrell,
thank you for your quick reply and for fixing this task in the next maintenance release for version 9.
We`ve already been thinking about perchasing an upgrade for our version 8.
The idea with the free concentration for OH- is a good one. I will try it out for my next calculations.
Best regards,
Christiane