Rosario Posted January 31, 2011 Posted January 31, 2011 I am trying to model the modern carbonate banks by mixing modern seawater composition with aragonite and calcite. The results I am getting are not what we see in modern carboante banks. I am using calcite kinetic rates for both calcite and aragonite. One problem that I have is that all the kinetic rates are in mole/m2 s and surface area in m2/g. In react all units are in cm2. If I don't change the units the model runs but is not realistic if I convert the units the model does not converge. The expected results should be the precipitation of dolomite and anhydrite and calcite dissolution. Thanks
Tom Meuzelaar Posted January 31, 2011 Posted January 31, 2011 Hi Rosario: If you can attach a script, I'd be happy to take a look. Regards, Tom Meuzelaar RockWare, Inc.
Rosario Posted January 31, 2011 Author Posted January 31, 2011 modern seawater sed kinetic.rea Tom, Thank you
Tom Meuzelaar Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Hi Rosario: I don't think the rate parameters are entirely behind the issue- kinetics is still driven by equilibrium. In your model, initial equilibration of seawater with calcite and aragagonite drives both minerals from undersaturation (dissolution) to supersaturation (precipitation). Given that the kinetic rates for both are identical, the mineral with higher thermodynamic stability (calcite) precipitates. Additionally, the rates you've set are so high that the model proceeds according to equilibrium and you have simple conversion of aragonite to calcite. I would fix this model by looking at two issues: 1. set realistic kinetic rates for calcite and aragonite for the timeframe you've specified. 2. try to set up initial equilibrium between seawater and aragonite/calcite in such a way that they are not initially supersaturated. I hope that helps, Tom Meuzelaar RockWare, Inc.
Rosario Posted February 2, 2011 Author Posted February 2, 2011 Hi Rosario: I don't think the rate parameters are entirely behind the issue- kinetics is still driven by equilibrium. In your model, initial equilibration of seawater with calcite and aragagonite drives both minerals from undersaturation (dissolution) to supersaturation (precipitation). Given that the kinetic rates for both are identical, the mineral with higher thermodynamic stability (calcite) precipitates. Additionally, the rates you've set are so high that the model proceeds according to equilibrium and you have simple conversion of aragonite to calcite. I would fix this model by looking at two issues: 1. set realistic kinetic rates for calcite and aragonite for the timeframe you've specified. 2. try to set up initial equilibrium between seawater and aragonite/calcite in such a way that they are not initially supersaturated. I hope that helps, Tom Meuzelaar RockWare, Inc. Tom, thank you. In order to do #2 would you run the model without the kinetic to equilibrate it. then pick up the fluids and interact it with the rocks again??? The kinetic rates are a problem because there is limited info. since it is always assumed that they are at local equilibrium.
Tom Meuzelaar Posted February 2, 2011 Posted February 2, 2011 Hi Rosario: Start by correcting the kinetic rates. At that point, you made need to fix pH or make other adjustments. I'm happy to take a further look.... Regards, Tom
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now