Jump to content
Geochemist's Workbench Support Forum

Regarding sorption simulation of Am(III), Tc(IV), and U(IV) on MX 80 bentonite using React module of GWB 12


Recommended Posts

Dear Jia Wang,

I would like to reproduce the modeling results of sorption of Am(III), Tc(IV), and U(IV) on MX 80 bentonite according to the themodynamic dataset (Tables 2 & 3) of attached reference paper (B. Grambow et al., 2006). Enclosed please find the React script, thermo dataset, sorbing surfaces files. However, the results log K values for Am (III), Tc (IV) and U (IV) were far from the literature where kd is defined as " sorbed (mg/kg)/ in fluid (mg/kg=mg/L)" . In addition, if the sorbate of iteration from config. was not chosen, the script could be run. If the sorbate was chosen, it could not be run and the result showed "Newton-Raphson did not converge after 999 iterations, maximum residual =   2.03e+183, Xi = 0.0000". I don't know why. I would appreciate any recommendation to understand the problem

Thanks in advance!

 

Polly

2006 B. Grambow sorption on bentonite.pdf Paper case study (U Kd)_1090330.rea thermo_phreeqc_Polly.tdat MX-80 IonEx (Grambow, 2006)_Polly.sdat MX-80 SCM (Grambow, 2006)_Polly.sdat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...