Jump to content
Geochemist's Workbench Support Forum

Jia Wang

Admin
  • Posts

    724
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Jia Wang last won the day on April 18

Jia Wang had the most liked content!

2 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Jia Wang's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Week One Done Rare
  • One Month Later Rare

Recent Badges

31

Reputation

  1. Hello Katerina, The sit activity model was added to the software in a later GWB release. The free GWB Community Edition includes the sit activity model. If you need more advanced features, you can upgrade your GWB 10 license to a GWB Subscription to get access to all the latest updates. Our special offer currently offers a 50% savings on the first year of subscription when you upgrade from an eligible license. If you are interested, please fill out our contact form to request more information. We also can provide a demo license of the latest release if you are interested in trying out the software. Best regards, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
  2. Hello Gregg, Glad to hear that helped. Best, Jia
  3. Hello Zhidi, Thank you for attaching your script. To troubleshoot, I checked "Follow Output" in the Results pane and "explain on" in the Stepping dialog before running your model to get a better idea what is limiting the size of the time step in the simulation. Doing so, I noticed that the rate limiting constraint right before the model runs into the newton-raphson iteration error is due to the change in Q/K for reactant Illite. To test, I simplified your model by setting Illite to a reaction rate of 0 and was able to run your simulation to completion. I also noticed that the reaction rates for various minerals do vary quite a lot be Could you provide a bit of context regarding your fluids and simulation? I noticed that a lot of component concentrations are the same but with a few differences. Are these fluids you have created or measured? I noticed that you have added all minerals as a kinetic reaction except Halite as a simple mineral. In general, kinetic reactions are useful for reactions that are proceeding slowly but measurable over the time period of interest. I noticed that Quartz is dissolving so slowly that it's not really doing anything. If the mineral barely reacts then perhaps you do not need to consider it in your model. This can help to simplify things in terms of the kinetic reactions running through your system. We don't typically see simple minerals, which are incrementally added to the domain over the course of the simulation in a reactivate transport simulation. If a mineral is in equilibrium with the initial fluid in the system, you should consider swapping it in for a component in your Initial pane. In general, it is good to check that the log Ks in the thermo database are suitable for the type of reactions occurring in your system. Hope this helps, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
  4. Hello Peter, There is theoretically nothing stopping you from overwriting a memory location. However, 'Order1', for example, is defined reactant by reactant in the Reactant class. Based on your description, it appears that you would want to use a member from the Reactant_status class instead of reactants. A member in the Reactant_status class is reported at every nodal block. Hope this helps, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
  5. Hello, You're welcome. I'm glad to hear that you're familiarizing yourself with TEdit. The GWB does not maintain any datasets. If you'd like to include the Zn-hydroxide reactions in thermo.tdat, simply copy and paste them from thermo.V8.R6+.tdat and save the customized dataset under a new name for your own use. Best regards, Jia
  6. Hello Gregg, Millivolt isn't among the default units for Eh in Act2. However, you can easily adjust the units by editing the image in PowerPoint. Simply copy the image (‘Edit’ -> Copy as -> Enhanced Metafile) and paste it onto a PowerPoint slide. Once pasted, right-click the image, select 'Ungroup', then edit the y-axis values and change the label to mV. Hope this helps, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
  7. Hello Zhidi, 1 and 2. Section 2.9 Boundary conditions and 2.10 Reaction intervals in the Reactive Transport Modeling guide explains how to set the fluid composition that you would inject at the boundary and the time length for how long you set the injection to last for. In section 3.2 Setting flow rate specifically informs how you can set the flow. You can set discharge directly but X1t also accepts pore_volumes flushed over the time length of your simulation. The pore space is considered as the saturated volume of the domain. In reactive transport models, the bulk volume of the domain is set by what you provide in the Domain tab. Unlike single-node apps, the bulk volume in a reactive transport model is determined by the domain size. 3. Please refer to section 2.12 Porosity evolution to see how this is handled in RTM apps. 4. Please see chapter 2.11 Kinetic reactions and gas buffers about setting reactants. If you are adding a Simple reactant, this is titrating in a set amount of mass over the course of the simulation, which is the same as React. If you are adding a kinetic mineral, then the mass or volume of the mineral set is in your initial domain. You can go about this in two ways, using either a relative unit (e.g. volume %) or absolute unit (e.g. mg) for each nodal block. Please section 2.7 Initial conditions in the same user guide to see how different types of units affect the way your problem is set up. Before jumping into the reactive transport modeling applications with your own problem, I think it is best to familiarize yourself by examining the examples provided with the guide. A good one to start would be the example of rainwater infiltering a quartz aquifer in section 3.6 of the RTM guide. Another good example is Chapter 3.8 Example: weathering in a soil profile. Hope this helps, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
  8. Hello, Changing the thermo file in your Preferences dialog will only affect new instances of the GWB applications. You can change dataset of any current or existing input file by going to "File" menu -> "Open" -> "Thermo Data...". Please see my response to your other post for how to view the currently loaded thermo dataset. Please consider posting to the same thread when you are following up on issues. It would be easier to keep track of related topics when you post to the same thread. Hope this helps, Jia
  9. Hello, Thank you for attaching your input file. The best way to see the reactions in a thermodynamic dataset loaded into your current calculation is to go to the "File" menu -> "View" -> click on the file with the extension .tdat or .dat to open in the TEdit application. You can filter on the element Zn and see all species containing Zn in its reaction. You can also use TEdit to edit datasets to add reactions from literature. For more information on using TEdit, please refer to chapter 9 in the GWB Essentials Guide. The default thermo dataset, thermo.tdat, doesn't contain any Zn-hydroxide species. An expanded version of the LLNL database, thermo.com.V8.R6+.tdat, is included in the software installation. Please see section 2.3 Thermodynamic datasets in the same guide for more information on datasets installed with the software. Hope this helps, Jia
  10. Hello Nick, You're welcome. I hope the rest of your project goes smoothly. Best regards, Jia
  11. Hello, It is very difficult to say what the issue might be without seeing your input file. A common error is that the species of interest may not be included in the thermo dataset. In that case, you will need to switch to another dataset that contains the species reaction you want to draw the activity diagram for. Another common error is that more stable species may appear and you need to suppress these for species unstable species may appear. Please see section 2.3 for more information on Thermodynamic datasets of the GWB Essentials Guide. You can find examples using Act2 in chapter 5 in the same guide. If this doesn't help and you would like someone to take a closer look, please attach your input file and thermodynamic dataset, and provide more context on what you are trying to create. Hope this helps, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
  12. Hello, Thank you for providing additional details. I do not have access to the models presented in Lazavera et al., 2015 and Horne et al. 2022. If you are trying to replicate their results or are working with their script but not seeing the expected results, I would suggest that you contact the corresponding authors on the publications. Swapping a mineral for a component in the basis tells the program to calculate that component's dissolved concentration in equilibrium with that mineral. You would only want to do this if you can assume that the mineral is in equilibrium with your initial fluid. Based on what you said above, it doesn't sound like this would be the appropriate path. You can find more about configuring your system in chapter 2 of the GWB Essentials Guide. Best regards, Jia
  13. Hello, Thank you for your thoughts and feedback on the program. This change is one of many updates to the software year about a decade ago. At this point, many other features in the program have been built upon this, and it would be very difficult to revert back to older behavior. Best regards, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
  14. Hello Nick, Are you talking about entering data into GSS or another GWB application? The software by default sets the total concentration (the mass of the thermodynamic component). What you enter for HPO4-- is a bulk constraint equal to the sum of H2PO4-, HPO4--, PO4---, etc. species. The software does allow you to specify the HPO4-- free ion concentration and calculate additional mass for other phosphorus species. To specify a free species concentration in GSS, you can right-click on the unit (e.g. mmol/kg) and select "Free". In another application like SpecE8 or React, you would left-click on the unit and select "Free". For more information regarding free vs. bulk concentrations, please see section 7.2 Equilibrium Model in the GWB Essentials Guide. Best regards, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
  15. Hello, Thank you for attaching your input file. From your input file, it looks like you are titrating a set amount of mass into the entire domain over the course of the simulation. When you add minerals as simple reactants, they are added to the domain incrementally throughout the simulation to alter the composition of your system. Was this what you intended? Perhaps you need to consider swapping in minerals if they can be treated as in equilibrium with the initial system or set them as kinetic reactions instead. If you plot the Mineral Saturation index for Arsenopyrite2 you will see that the mineral is undersaturated with respect to the fluid, so any simple Arsenopyrite2 added will not remain in the solid phase. You can check the mass of Arsenopyrite2 added in by plotting the Variable type "Reactants properties". If you would like further help with troubleshooting, please provide a bit more context as to what you are trying to do. Hope this helps, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC
×
×
  • Create New...