Reza_Kh_92 Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 Hello there, Can anyone help with figuring out what is wrong with my reactive transport modeling work; I get the known error of “Newton-Raphson didn't converge after 999 iterations, max residual = 5.63e-11, Xi = 0.0102 Newton failed at node 0”? I am trying to simulate weathering in soil with the weathering example (chapter 27.2 in the book) as the benchmark. The main difference is adding a silicate mineral (wollastonite) to see the effect on soil and leachate as well as calcite precipitation. Also, for the kinetic rates of minerals, I used the data reported in Palandri et al. I have attached my file, and I am using V8.R6+ thermo data set. I would appreciate it if you could please guide me. Thanks, Reza Weathering in soil.x1t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jia Wang Posted July 20, 2023 Share Posted July 20, 2023 Hello Reza, A few suggestions to help you start troubleshooting: Kinetic models are best for modeling reactions that are slow but observable in the time span of your simulation. In X1t, you can perform a "Go initial" run to calculate the initial equilibrium state before any time steps take place. If you do so and plot the Dissolution rates under Reactant Properties for all minerals, you will see that Wollastonite has a very high initial dissolution rate compared to other minerals. Having a much faster rate is going to force the program to take smaller time steps for one but also may make it much more difficult to converge. If you have reactions that are occurring really fast, you might consider just constraining it as an equilibrium reaction instead of using kinetics. Once I removed Wollastonite, X1t failed later in the simulation. I tried decreasing the step size, delxi, in the Stepping dialog to 0.001. Since there are only three nodes in your model, a smaller time step in general seems to have helped. If you want to use the nucleus density for precipitation calculations where there is no mass for kinetic minerals present initially, you would want to include the nucleus density in your rate law scripts. If you don't, the nucleus density won't be considered for calculating a surface area for nucleation. Since you are using a script, you can add a simple IF statement that looks something like: IF surface < nucleus * soln_volume THEN 20 ELSE 40 20: rate = -nucleus * [rest of your equation here] GOTO 60 40: rate = -surface*[rest of your equation here] 60: RETURN rate In general, I would suggest you start by simplifying your simulation. You might want to remove the minerals and start with one reaction interval to see how far you get. You should also double check the values in the rate law to make sure they are correct. Hope this helps, Jia Wang Aqueous Solutions LLC 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reza_Kh_92 Posted July 26, 2023 Author Share Posted July 26, 2023 Hi Jia, Thanks for your reply and suggestions. They are definitely helpful. For Wollastonite, I am trying to use another kinetic rate law to see if it fits the model. Regards, Reza Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.